ADHOC Work Group : Position Papers

Organisational Structure : Draft 1

Harold Short : Jan 03


Aims & objectives

The key objectives of the ADHO are to promote the scholarly application of advanced technologies in humanities research and teaching, and to create an associational framework that supports this as effectively as possible across a wide range of activities and countries.

The proposed organisational structures, as detailed below, aim to provide a framework for more effective and wider-ranging collaboration immediately, and for coherent long term development.


Current practice

The two associations leading the ADHO initiative are both well established in the field. The ACH has N American origins, the ALLC European, but both are international in membership. Since 1989 the two Associations have held annual joint conferences, with the venue alternating between North America and Europe. The collaborative nature of the joint conferences is governed by a formal protocal, and managed on a practical basis by a Programme Committee whose members are appointed in equal numbers (4 each) by the two Associations.

Other collaboration between the two Associations, and between the Associations and other bodies, has been on an informal basis.

The ACH is managed by an Executive Council, elected on a rolling basis, and a President and Vice-President, elected for 2-year terms. The electorate in all cases is the full (individual) membership of the Association. The meetings of the EC normally take place at the annual joint conference, and considerable business is done by email.

The ALLC is managed by a Committee which consists of 9 elected members and 5 officers appointed by the Committee. The officers are the President, Chair, Secretary, Treasurer, and the Editor of Literary and Linguistic Computing. The Editor of LLC is appointed sine die, the President for 3-year terms, and the Chair, Secretary and Treasurer for 1-year terms. The elected members are elected on a rolling basis to 3-year terms, with 3 being elected in any given year.


Range of possibilities

The two possibilities for future development which have had most attention are (i) merger and (ii) collaborative membership in a broader umbrella grouping. There are undoubtedly other possible frameworks for collaboration.

The option which is proposed here is the creation of ADHO as a broad umbrella grouping, within which ACH, ALLC and other organisations which wish to join will retain their identity. There are two principal reasons for proposing this:


Proposals

It is proposed that

Rationale

The rationale for these proposals is that ADHO can provide a framework that 'at worst' will make current collaborative ventures more effective, and if it works as intended will provide a context for new initiatives, new types of collaboration, and a more coherent identity at international level, and greater mutual support at regional and country level.

Opportunities for collaboration

Among the more important collaborative opportunities that ADHO will offer are:

Administrative arrangements

While it would be possible to consider centralising a number of administrative functions, this is not proposed at the initial stage. The proposed structural and administrative arrangements are:

Constitution, and regional independence

An important underlying concept in these proposals is the continuing independence of the constituent member organisations. ADHO will provide a framework for collaboration for independent regional chapter organisations (such as ACH and ALLC) and international affiliates (such as TEI). ADHO will require a constitution and bye-laws, and its creation will provide an opportunity for the constitution and bye-laws of the member organisations to be updated and harmonised to some extent at least, as appropriate.

As part of its global mission, ADHO should create a template set of constitution and bye-laws to provide a starting point for new regional chapters.


Financial implications

The broad financial implications of creating ADHO are addressed in the main Finances section of this paper.

In the proposed administrative arrangements, subventions will be required to provide clerical and secretarial assistance to the three officers: Editor of the print journal; Editor of the electronic publications; Financial Administrator. (The ALLC already has an arrangement of this kind to support the Editor of Literary and Linguistic Computing.)


Transition requirements/options

The key transition requirements are: