One important objective of ADHO as a whole, and of its membership initiatives as well, must be to increase participation, worldwide, in coordinated scholarly societies for humanities computing. Increasing participation means:
The specific goals of coordinating existing organizations under ADHO should be:
In current practice, ACH and ALLC are individual membership organizations, with one common benefit of membership: the joint annual conference. Technically, ALLC has institutional members (the institutional subscribers to LLC), but institutional members have no vote. At present, each association also has its own journal, and subscription to the journal is a principal benefit of membership.
In the case of ACH, membership services (including billing and collecting membership fees) are performed by the treasurer, and a substantial portion ($50 of $65) is paid to Kluwer for each journal subscription. Student or emeritus faculty memberships are $55, of which $50 goes to Kluwer. The ACH web site lists the following benefits of membership:
In the case of ALLC, since membership is by way of subscription to LLC, maintenance of the membership list is provided by the journal publisher (Oxford UP, currently) and Oxford and ALLC share the profits on the journal 50/50, including profits on institutional subscriptions. Journal prices are as follows:
| GB Pound | US Dollar | |
| Institutional | 141.00 | 235.00 |
| Personal - includes membership to Association for Literary & Linguistic Computing | 49.00 | 83.00 |
| Personal - Student or Senior Citizen rate | 25.00 | 45.00 |
| Personal - Unwaged rate | 25.00 | 45.00 |
| Membership rate - Institutional for Modern Languages Association | 112.80 | 188.00 |
| Membership rate - Personal for Linguistic Society of America | 112.80 | 188.00 |
Benefits of membership, beyond subscription to LLC, include: eligibility for project support (annual award of up to 5,000 GBP), eligibility for bursaries (for student members) up to 500 GBP. Student essay prizes (500 GBP) and workshop assistance (2500 GBP) are open to non-members.
STS is a individual membership organization, with basic membership dues at $60. STS has two benefits of membership--a subscription to the print journal TEXT (University of Michigan Press) and participation in the biennial conference. STS offers a joint membership with the European Society for Textual Scholarship, including TEXT and the ESTS journal Variants, for $100, and it offers several more expensive classes of membership for those who wish to support the STS at a higher level (Sustaining Member, for $250, Patron Member, for $500). Students and Retirees have the option of belonging to STS without receiving TEXT, for $15.
TEI and NINCH are institutional membership organizations, with no benefits of membership in common with one another or with ACH or ALLC (although it has been customary for some time now to hold an open meeting for the TEI at the joint annual conference of ACH and ALLC). The fee for membership in TEI and in NINCH is variable, depending on the size of the organization: for TEI, the range is $100/year to $5,000/year, with the average membership fee being about $2,500. For NINCH, the range is $500/year to $5,000/year. NINCH also has a small number of corporate sponsors, at $10,000/year.
NINCH has no tangible benefits of membership, but its "Why You Should Join NINCH" page states:
The benefits of joining NINCH are those of joining a platform where key work is being done to construct a rich "exploratorium" of knowledge and discovery for cultural materials that avoids the pitfalls that would produce a pale and fragmented digital world where works can not be usefully connected or related to other materials, cannot be authenticated or disappear without trace.
TEI members receive one free print copy of the TEI guidelines, and discounts on subsequent copies. TEI also permits individuals as subscribers, but subscribers do not vote as members. Subscribership in TEI costs $50/year. Beyond the guidelines, which are also available in html to non-members, the benefits of membership in the TEI include preferential registration at TEI workshops and training sessions, discounts on software (Peter Robinson's Anastasia is the only product that has so far been proposed for a discount) and soon, discounts on keyboarding services from Apex Data Services.
For ACH and ALLC, it seems clear that it is desirable to consolidate existing journal publishing activities, and equally clear that LLC is the better business platform on which to do that. If membership in ALLC is by subscription to LLC, with the publisher providing membership billing and renewal services, it seems equally clear that ACH would need to consolidate membership at least with ALLC, and at least to the extent of channeling it through LLC subscription--though it would be possilbe and probably desirable to distinguish members of the two organizations in record-keeping, if only to facilitate the distribution of membership/subscription income.
ALLC also has institutional members, but at a much lower cost than TEI or NINCH. Both of those organizations depend on membership income at this higher level to operate, and therefore they could not reduce their membership fees to the level of an ALLC institutional membership. Profit from LLC institutional subscriptions is a significant part of the ALLC's income at present, too, and that means that a common institutional membership that included subscription to LLC and membership in, say, TEI, would have to come at something like the cost of combined TEI/ALLC membership. Both could presumably benefit from having a publisher provide membership billing and renewal services, though.
For STS, it is not clear that consolidating membership with ACH and ALLC would make sense, because it does not seem likely that STS wants to consolidate its journal publishing activities in LLC.
Given all of the above, the most beneficial, least disruptive course of action on membership would seem to be one that included:
In the plan proposed above, membership rates would rise for ACH members, but stay the same for everyone else. In fact, the implication of the proposals above is that the real consolidation, at an organizational level, would be between ACH and ALLC, with other organizations being more loosely allied, mostly through discounted memberships and subscriptions. This is probably an inevitable outcome, because of the disparity in the size of the budgets of these organizations, and the difference in their missions. TEI is international; NINCH is national. TEI is about maintaining a standard; NINCH aims to provide a crosswalk between cultural organizations on issues of digitization. The annual budgets of TEI and NINCH are both around $250,000/year, and both are underfunded at that level. Combining the two organizations, while maintaining their current missions and activities, would simply result in a larger, but still underfunded, organization. On the other hand, cooperative arrangements (discounts and other considerations) across these organizations would provide tangible benefits of membership for each.
The transition requirements under the plan outlined above are not too onerous: